Orange is the New Black Essay

piper Kerman is a Smith College potash alum who is serving thirteen months in prison house, from 2004 to 2005, for a medicate transactionking and bills launder villainy she holdted nearly decennary age before. For near of her entire stay piper is placed in a minimum-security prison in Danbury, computed axial tomography. I am from Avon, Connecticut so because her story was so wet to home it immediately struck me as interesting. Her experience is eye opening, and as the accommodate progresses you sens put one over a sharp trans homunculusation from a normal several(prenominal)one to a steadfastlyened convict. genus bagpipers book, Orange is the bracing Black, gives insight into the realities of womens minimum-security prisons in the join States and how the criminal judge system industrial plant today. Which, as we find pop, disregard be a colossal and frustrating process. season it seems a bit absurd that genus genus Piper is being locked onward for a of fense committed ten old age ago, I do esteem it is justified. What she did was illegal and when you undo the laws you go to jail. That being said, I can understand why one would look that this was non justified for two run absentments, the commencement ceremony being the fact that she committed her drug trafficking and money laundering offensive legal action ten years ago. This may be true, except that doesnt mean it was ruin, you still invite to be punished for your actions. The second reason this would be seen as unfair is because she was youngish and stupid when she did it. This I do non find is an excuse at consentaneous because that does non exclude her from learned what she was doing and knowing it was hurt. I require to add though, spot I learn that the penalization for her umbrages were justified, as in the prison sentence, I do non guess it was fair that the whole process took that long in general. To run into an accurate assessment, though, I think that you take a crap to look at the stopping points of punishment and see if each finishing was met as well.When intellection ab proscribed the goals of punishment the first that comes to drumhead is retri scarceion. This is punishment based on a perceived need for vengeance, or that flock should receive what they deserve. If you add hard you berewarded and if you break the rules you get punished, therefore Piper has to pay book binding for what she did. In this case it is hard to decide if Piper received a fair punishment. When she got charged with money laundering she was fostering an judicature operate. Even if she didnt know the full consequences of her actions, she knew that is was wrong. The drug organization was non that using it to take its buying of drugs, however it could also stir been doing many a(prenominal) early(a) horrible things.Although she verifys she had no idea what was happening with the money or how it was being used, we book to rememb er that this is only her side of the story and that the judge judgement on her case has so many liars that would say the same thing. Because the punishment was from so long ago it seems like it snuck up on her and was unfair, but I notice that if she had been punished right after her offense was committed everyone would not aroma as bad about it. I feel that the retribution she received was justified for her actions, in quantify if they were ten years ago.The second goal of punishment is incapacitation. The purpose of this is to separate offenders from their union as to dishonor their ability to commit certain crimes. In this case, I do not think that this goal was accomplished. Although Piper had committed a crime, she was not sledding to commit any much she had wedded that conduct up and was trying to move on. The reason for incapacitation is if you think someone pull up stakes commit a crime again that could negatively c all in all for the community.As I said, not on ly was Piper locomote on from her other life, she was do keen tramples to become a senesce adult, from starting a relationship to mentation hard about her future. I want to point out the difference amidst retribution and incapacitation and why I apply with one and not the other. I think that Piper should have been punished for what she did, that is retribution. On the other hand, I do not think that Piper was a little terror to her community, and that there was not a happen she would do it again. So in the reason speckle I do agree that it was needed as a punishment, I do not think that it was necessary to stop her from committing another(prenominal) crime again. determent is the third goal of punishment and is congenial with incapacitation. Deterrence is the threat of punishment to move peoplethat the crime or activity they argon committing is not worth it. at that place argon two types of bullying in my opinion and one of them was successful epoch the other was n ot. In Pipers case, while she did think about the fact that when she was smuggling the money over she might get caught, it did not deter her from truism no. Piper still decided that she would drug traffic and money launder so on the face of it the idea of going to prison did not restore her decision. So, in this case, I would say that no, under this meaning deterrence was not met. On the other hand, another form of deterrence is the idea that you can reduce the amount of repeat offenders coming back again and again.Under this definition I believe that in Pipers case this deterrence was effective. Although when she committed the crime the first time she was not idea about the punishment at all really. Now, she cant get the thought of prison out of her head for a day, let wholly if she was going to do something illegal. Her experience was so life changing it entrust affect the way she thinks and acts from the time she gets out, and I would insure that a success as far as deterr ence. The fourth and final goal of punishment is rehabilitation, or the idea that you can change the way an offender thinks and behaves into a more positive form. There are many different forms of rehabilitation but most focus on the reduction of criminal offences through support and help from the community. The hope being that the offender will change their attitude toward what they have through and make them see that the behavior was wrong. This is where I feel there was a major(ip) job with Pipers experience.The entire time I was reading the book I was wait for her to explain how sad she was that she had committed the crime or that she realized it was wrong. quite of her saying these things, the only thing I hear was the fact that she thought it was ridiculous for her to be here for so long, or that most of the people in the camp didnt deserve to be in for what they did. maculation she was locked up she was thinking and writing, but it was not about how she realized that wha t she had done was wrong, but kinda it was how badly she missed everyone she loved. She did not mention the fact that she realized her wrong doing and that if she hadnt had of done those things, so long ago, that she never would have been in this situation, instead she complained that her sentence was unfair and that she was a gracious lady who didnt deserve this. This is the problem I have with the criminal justice system now a days. Itseems as if most of the ladies in the prison with Piper were doing the same thing, waiting to get out of jail.These people are not thinking about what they did to get into these situations, trying to discontinue themselves and getting prepared for the outside world. Instead it seemed as if they were only concerned with fashioning their time in prison as nice as possible and in a sense trying to choke up why they are there in the first place. They focused on making their time in prison more comfortable and finding out slipway to get what they wa nted while disruption the rules. I think that there are different reasons for this and they are not all the prisoners fault. One of the major problems was that while Danbury had some working programs, there were just not enough classrooms that were functional, or teachers, to be effective. give away back into the community is an important step that needs to be done in the right steps to succeed. On the other hand, in my opinion, the prisoner is in for doing something wrong and being punished. If they had not committed the crime they would not be taken away from their chances to be successful in the world. darn it may seem tough, it is just another form of privileges being taken away, if they had not committed the crime it would never have happened.So, in the end, Pipers stay was justified in my opinion and she had it coming to her in the end, you cannot convey to do something illegal and get away with it. I believe that throughout the book, while certain aspects of punishment wer e touched upon, not all were met. While she gave retribution (ten years later), and next time will defiantly be deterred, Im not to sure how successful the rehabilitation realm was or if the incapacitation was necessary. I do think that it is necessary to point out though that Pipers case is not how it is in a lot of cases due to the fact that she has a loving husband and strong family ties. In the end though, Piper had a life changing experience that will affect her for the rest of her life, from her experiences in prison to her work on the board of Womens prison Association.