Legality of Income Taxes

The issue regarding the ratifiedity of income levy on attention is really a sensational one that it gets my wariness right away from the moment I heard otherwise heap saying that it is non included in the bounds of our constitution the dissimulation of the fork over tongue to assessation. In order to verify this claim, I make my accept study regarding the legality of the state taxation scheme and I set up out that in that respect is no statement on our constitution or in the Internal R notwithstandingue Code stating that we argon required to lucre an income tax from our labor.Therefore, what is the basis of the government officials for charging us income taxes on labor if there is no single statement on our constitution that would supplement the said taxation schemes? With this, I may say, that income tax on labor is bootleg for there is no statement in our constitution or even in the Internal Revenue Code saying that we have to accept for our labor.With my position stated above, let me first further elaborate my arguments. fit in to our constitution, there argon only two slips of income that is organism imposed by our government and they atomic number 18 the beam and in study income taxes (Chapter 1 Constitutional Taxation. 1). manage taxes include income taxes on wages and salaries of the citizens. Therefore, income tax on labor is not included in the direct taxes. Moreover, the condition indirect tax was not used in the constitution but rather some(prenominal) tax that is not direct.But this any tax that is not direct includes Duties, Imposts and Excises. Once a fall upon, income tax on labor is not included into this type of income tax. Either of the said two types of income tax did not even hold back any possibility that income tax on labor is included into at least one of them. There are really income taxes that are of vixenish in nature and that most of us could help but to head the credibility of the said tax scheme.As said by Edwin R.A. Seligman, the absolute Court of the United States has thus held that certain kinds of income taxes are indirect, that certain other kinds of income taxes are direct, and that still other kinds of income taxes are invalid, irrespective of whether they are direct or indirect (2).As for the Internal Revenue Code, there is in like manner vagueness in the definition of what income is. Although it has been cited in the definitions of terms in Title 26 of the Internal Revenue Code, but none of them define the meaning of the term income. On the other hand, there are some legal cuticles that give their own definition of income as applicable to their situation and period. Like for practice session the case between Staples and US wherein they define income as tantamount to gain which could also coined as profit based from the 16th Amendment and the Revenue Acts.They made a default definition of income based from the 16th Amendment and Revenue Acts for the tendency of their leg al case. Another definition of the term income as based from legal cases would be the case between Conner and the U.S. as well as the case of Oliver and Halstead wherein they made a clarification regarding the difference between profit and wages. It is said that wages cannot be considered as profit within the bounds of fair play for profit means gains from investment or from business operation (What is income? 4).Economically, income taxes are being used in order to generate bullion to finance the projects and other functions of our government. Without these taxes, there would be no public schools, public hospitals as well as roadstead and other infrastructures that are of very central towards the attainment of impressive growth for the economy (Moffat 1). Like for instance, the construction of roads which are important for transporting goods from far flung states going to cities and other market areas.Without this roads, acid costs of producers increases and so with the prices of their products. But the question is, are all of the taxes that were paid by the tax payers really go to support the said functions of the government?According to Grace Commission Report, there are a lot of ways by which tax payers could save rough $420 billion over three years without increasing the taxes being smooth to them. Moreover, Grace told President Reagan that 1/3 of the taxes that were collected are being wasted and another third are not collected and the rest third that the government could received are entirely absorbed by the Federal Debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments (The peoples income tax guide Where do your taxes go? 1).In short, there is no single cent that goes to the funding of governments functions to the state. The government gets its funds from loans from the IMF. Moreover, the funds being used for schools came from property taxes funds for roads and link up came from gas taxes while user fees funds airports, sewer and wa ter systems.In this regard, based from our constitution and from the report of Grace Commission, income tax on labor is illegal since it is not stated in our constitution or any of our laws and to make things worst, the income tax on labor that were collected did no allot it purpose which are being expected by the tax payers to the government. work CitedThe peoples income tax guide Where do your taxes go? 2003. integrity in Taxation.US. 19 October 2007 Chapter 1 Constitutional Taxation. 2000. Constitutionalincome.com. 19 October 2007What is income? June 2007. Outraged.chatblogs.com. 19 October 2007Moffat, Mike. The gear up of Income Taxes on Economic Growth. 2007. 19 October 2007 Seligman, Edwin R.A. The Income Tax Amendment. 1910. Political Science quarterly 193, 197. 19 October 2007.